C 14 dating controversy

Just how reliable, then, is this radiometric method for estimating the ages of fossils? High-energy cosmic rays (actually sub-atomic particles) from space continually crash into atoms in the earth’s upper atmosphere.The result of such a collision is a shower of sub-atomic debris, including many neutrons.

Rasmus Nyerup's quote reminds us of the tremendous scientific advances which have taken place in the 20th century.In earlier essays we have shown that the process of evolution can really not be demonstrated in the fossil record, nor can it be demonstrated in the world of living things today.But in the popular mind, C-14 dating is associated with an evolutionary history of life. Additional tests were done on six grain samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. and 12 charcoal samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. The literature on the subject is enormous, so I will not attempt to give you references. There is a heated debate going on among scholars concerning this, especially with regard to the date of the eruption of Thera (Santorini).

Search for c 14 dating controversy:

c 14 dating controversy-38

Neutrons are found in the nuclei of all atoms except ordinary hydrogen atoms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “c 14 dating controversy”